Every defect in a persona using the room's instruments, from the moment it was seen in a live room to the commit that closed it — one row each, newest first, kept current in the same change as each fix. Opened 2026-07-30 and backfilled to the SG deploy that morning（8bbf054 → 1c93144, v656 — the deploy that put the whole toolbox era in front of real players）. The deep write-ups stay on their own pages（game-integrity · the lifecycle audit）; this page is the index a session checks before blaming a persona.
A defect enters from a live room (the owner playing, on the box or on :8011), in the owner's words. It gets a root cause read against the code — never against the transcript alone — then a fix, then a pin: a smoketest check or an exam scenario that fails if it returns. A row is closed only when the pin exists; narrowed means measurably better with a known remainder; open means recorded, not yet built.
| # | found | symptom, in the owner's words | root cause | fix · pin | state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 08-01 · sim 20Q exit runs (rooms 3217 · a84a) | 已问 ran to 9 after five questions — every answer turn's single inc landed TWO ticks, while the host's own spoken count（「已问5」）stayed right; she even hand-corrected the card mid-game | the double collection — THREE collectors could walk one span, each pair fixture-proven: ① the text-path fallback synthesizes artifacts[] FROM raw's outside remainder（the router's「an artifact is never a slice of raw」claim was false there）; ② the text-path healer ABSORBS the after-speak tail into the last reply, so a trailing tag decodes from the reply AND salvages from raw — this was the live rooms' double; ③ the lawful door: woken hands echoing the mouth's exact op re-land the same settle. The board half of every double was silently absorbed by the append dedup; the ops half doubled the counters. Only the rows-vs-已问 referee（the law, not the script index）made it visible — and it likely IS the long-standing intermittent count drift | three doors: the artifact slice stands down（dda849e）· ONE SPAN ONE COLLECTION — an outside row equal to one already collected drops, a deliberate repeat lives in one region and is preserved there · ONE INTENT ONE EXECUTION — the hands' echo of the mouth's exact op lands once, a true double-step names n="2"（both c0ce2d0）. Pin: room 0bf4's exact payload → one pair of ticks, one board line | closed |
| 43 | 08-01 · sim 20Q run 1 (room f0cd) | an act call woken with「the rows are owed」revealed the sealed answer at Q7, mid-game — and a later one double-ticked a counter — instead of writing the board it was woken for | the hands hold the manual but not the game: the act call's short history window does not contain the Q&A list the rows need, so a wake that asks for content the hands never saw gets a guess at「settling」— and the nearest settle-shaped verbs were reveal and inc | defanged by #42 rather than patched: with rows travelling in speech the lag never accrues, the wake path goes quiet, and the hands are never again asked to write content only the persona knows. Run 2: zero wrong wake moves, wrong guess correctly REFUSED with board-based reasoning（run 1 had torn the box open）. Residual watched: any future cue that asks the hands for CONTENT should carry the material or stay speech-side | narrowed — by design, watched |
| 42 | 08-01 · sim 20Q runs 1–2 (rooms f0cd · 0169) | the score moved every answer and the table never did — by endgame the host mimed writing the board in prose, pen in hand（「*提笔，快速划过板面*…」）, reciting all seven rows she had never been allowed to land | the wall's asymmetry was structural: under the split, counter OPS pass from speech（ops on live cards are exempt）while board WRITES wall as arms — so the one turn that knows the row's content（the persona's answering breath）physically could not write it, and the only open door（the act call, on a PROP verdict）ran on the wrong turns with the wrong knowledge（see #43） | THE ROW DOOR: <board append>…the new line…</board> makes a row op-shaped — the counter tick's sibling. Appends + pen hand-overs to the LIVE board pass the wall; full rewrites and no-board writes still wall, and the refusal now teaches the lawful form; the applier joins a run of appends under the existing text; the riding note teaches it beside the tick grammar. 9697448 · 5 pins · measured 0/6 → 6/6 rows kept pace, appends landing in the same breath as the answers | closed |
| 41 | 08-01 · the live troupe (first run) | the simulated 20Q room reproduced the owner's Zaha defect ON DEMAND: six questions answered, counters ticking, and the board held ZERO rows throughout — one hour after the「row is part of the answer」kit hardening shipped | a kit law alone cannot carry a SILENT omission: the host answers without board writes and without announcing them, so the promise check's lexical net（which needs instrument WORDS in the reply）never triggers — the predicted residual（「a host who neither arms nor announces still stalls」）now measured | THE ROW-LAG CUE, world-side and general: the world can SEE the disagreement it holds（counters moved N times since the board's text last changed — a mechanical predicate over two timestamps, any tally game, no content sniffing）. Hands see「the rows are OWED」at lag≥2; the wake door cues at lag≥3, once per crossing, computed BEFORE the fresh guard（ticks are covered events）. 2a5f6db · 6 pins. In run 1 the cue FIRED and produced the first mid-game backfill — and thereby exposed the structural half, #42, which is where the full fix landed | closed |
| 40 | 08-01 · 漫画の比較 (8011) | 「真心话」said in a Japanese ART conversation summoned the truth-or-dare pill — totally out of context — and the panel pivoted to the game on its own | TWO separate things, and only one was ours: ① the PILL fired on the raw substring match alone — while the prop master's own verdict on that very turn was NONE（「不是对桌上物品的请求」）; the auto-load consulted the verdict, the pill never did. ② The personas' pivot was the models' own word-association — NOTHING entered their context（verified from the room: no kit_load, no injection） | the pill consults the verdict it already paid for — the split is symmetric now: match+SETUP auto-loads · match+PROP offers the pill · match+NONE surfaces NOTHING（a name in passing is conversation, and the room's judge already said so）. A dropped offer un-dedups so a later genuine reach can still be offered. The panel's own association is mind-side and unfirewallable — but with no pill amplifying it, an ambiguous bare word is just a thing a host may ask about | shipped |
| 39 | 08-01 · spy1 + spy2 (8011) | 「didn't call out the poll spontaneously」（twice — rescued one turn late by a guest's nudge each time）·「whiteboard not updating」through an elimination ·「don't know when to end the game」while the host's own private note held the full map（Dan=极光） | the host's INITIATIVE had no door: the prop master reads the GUEST's words and runs BEFORE the host speaks, so the turn where the host himself decides「now the ballot」/「the board changes」/「the end is checked」has nobody to open it — his words promise, the hands never move | THE PROMISE CHECK: a classic turn that arms nothing but whose reply speaks instrument words gets one flash question（did the words announce furniture going up NOW?）— a YES runs the act call with the reply as its spec, the deliberate phase-2 machinery reused verbatim. Kit-gated: a chat room never pays the call. Plus the settle's standing affordances（board currency · the END check joined to the elimination moment）and the spy sheet's「淘汰后立刻查终局」step. Measured: exp-tally anomalies 7→4, ticks ≤1→10, first fully-clean runs of the day; controls 6/6 untouched. 5 pins | shipped |
| 38 | 08-01 · SG Trivia (flash act) | 「persona write one question and options in the bubble, then slightly changed them in the Poll」— and the FIRST vote carried bare letters（options=[A,B,C,D], no content）: nothing meaningful to tap without the bubble | the options had TWO displays（the bubble and the card）and two generated copies drift — under flash-0731 badly; pro copies the speech verbatim（the deliberate spec law）far more reliably | ONE DISPLAY, in the quiz kit: speak the question, the card is the options' single home — never read the option list into the bubble, and the card carries FULL option text（a bare「A」is nothing to tap）. Plus the flash evidence: the same day's pro room produced none of these shapes — recommend act back to PRO（the cache lever already cut the act cost 38%, which was flash's reason to exist） | shipped |
| 37 | 08-01 · SG Trivia (flash act) | 「write private to do to note and doc of the wildcard pane」— the host's RUN SHEET published as a public document, three times（in 卧底 this would show the hand） | the wildcard pane is the OPEN capture channel: everything the speech model writes outside dialogue tags routes there BY DESIGN（structural capture, model-agnostic）— so a run sheet the mind puts in prose becomes a public document; note vs document there is only the classifier's presentation guess（structured → document, short plain → note） | THE PAD LAW in the kit wrapper（one place, every kit）:「your run sheet lives in your PAD, nowhere else — the shared pane is PUBLIC and a plan there shows your hand」. The capture channel itself stays open — it is the artifacts feature working as designed; the teaching moves the private material to the private tool | shipped |
| 36 | 08-01 · SG 20Q-room dice (pro act) | 「Failed to generate dice for all players」— CW never got a cup across FOUR turns; the host claimed cups were placed（「你的骰子来了」「都有了」）over refused arms, then a guest's 清理桌子 ask swept nothing | THREE stacked: ① the act call copied the kit spec's placeholder「第N轮」as a literal label; ② the uniqueness door REFUSED the twin — and a naming refusal mid-game costs whole turns while the speech claims success; ③ the redo ask（收了重来）re-armed without first taking the stale cards away | ① THE PLACEHOLDER LAW（spec wrapper）: 第N轮/uN/Amy=5 are templates — substitute real values. ② THE WORLD MINTS THE DISTINCTION: on a label collision the card LANDS renamed（the one owner's name — 「第N轮 · CW」— else an ordinal）and the outcome books the rename; the invariant（two cards must be tellable apart）stands, the world supplies it. Labels only: a vote's title is its QUESTION and still refuses; human doors keep their sheet-side ask. 4 pins. ③ THE REDO LAW（spec wrapper）: a redo is TWO moves — away the stale cards first（target="table" on a full reset）, then arm fresh | shipped |
| 35 | 08-01 · gameroom ledger audit | owner ask:「is the cost in the chat info menu accurate?」— it was NOT: the menu read ~14% under this room's true spend（$0.056 shown · ~$0.065 real） | the act call's tally sat INSIDE the「tag or missing」note-block — an act call that answered kind=none（the COMMONEST answer, a real call at real prices）booked its event and billed NOBODY | the tally rides WITH the event, unconditionally — a call is billed because it RAN, never because its answer armed something. RAM-probe pin: one clean-none turn, ledger equals events to the cent. Historic rooms keep their recorded figures（a floor, not exact） | shipped |
| 34 | 08-01 · gameroom | 「the host started the game twice」— the setup dealt correctly, then the settle-wake turn TOOK THE CARDS BACK and re-dealt: players who had looked at their words got new ones（deal_open · roll_clear · deal_open, board pinned twice） | the kit's TABLE SPEC rides EVERY act call as a standing order, and its「Setup (one beat)」lines read as still-to-do on the wake turn right after the setup — while deal-over-live REPLACES by design（ledger #27's ruling）, so the second setup tore up the live table silently | THE ONCE-ONLY LAW in the spec's injection wrapper（one place, every kit）:「the setup beat runs ONCE — if this game's furniture is already out, the setup is DONE; a live game wants the NEXT step or kind=none; only the host's own spoken order restarts a table」. Repro probe: kit + setup + two wake turns → one deal_open, zero tear-ups. ⚠ THE UX HALF（owner:「the feeling is that there is a race」）: the suggest chip used to pop at MESSAGE time — an invitation on screen while the host was already acting on the same words, so the natural tap landed mid-flight as a second impulse. The chip now WAITS FOR THE REPLY（stashed at match, published by the drain worker after the turn broadcasts; dropped if a kit landed meanwhile）, and the kit-load cue names both readings of a standing table（THIS game's own — fold in, no re-explaining · another game's leavings — the sweep） | shipped |
| 33 | 08-01 · owner ask | 「users switch games or ditch a game halfway — how do we make sure the previous tools are properly closed and don't impact the later gameplay?」— in one live 卧底 session a host wrote FOUR aways to clear one table | no one-move exit existed: game-over meant addressing every card by handle, one act each — and a kit swap never told the room what was still standing from the old game | THE GAME-OVER SWEEP: op=away target="table" — every open card leaves by its OWN lawful exit（a sealed pile publishes · a ballot cancels with its count · the clock stops）; the board and the pads deliberately stay. Taught in the act schema and in the bare-away refusal（the probe showed the host meaning「everything」and giving no handle — the refusal now names the sweep）. The kit-load cue lists the leftovers:「STANDING FROM BEFORE: … one move clears them all」. 7 pins + the exp-switch selfplay cell（kit A half-game → kit B: the cue carried, no stale card crossed） | shipped |
| 32 | 08-01 · Ke-ish 卧底 | 「leakage of arming to msg bubble」— raw <deposit>/<ballot> tags visible in chat, and phantom deposits armed with the game's word pair sitting in a PUBLIC label | two doors, one habit: the kit run-sheets TAUGHT the tag syntax（the host copied his own rulebook out loud）, and under the turn split the panel's speech decode still consumed arm blocks — a second, unpoliced arming door beside the act call | the kit run-sheets rewritten prose-only（no tag syntax anywhere a persona reads as vocabulary）+ THE SPLIT-MODE FIREWALL: under the split, arm blocks written in panel SPEECH are dropped with a loud outcome（「your WORDS are the setup order and the hands set the table」）and the tag syntax is scrubbed from the bubble. Pads（the run-sheet channel）, seals into standing boxes, and every op on an existing card stay legal — only the ARMING door closes. ⚠ THE WALL'S OWN TWO BUGS, caught the same day by the exp cells + the A/B worktree law: ① the act call's lawful tags rode the SAME reply text the firewall walls — extraction now parses them apart and merges AFTER the wall; ② `suppress_armed`'s「the speech version wins」handed the family to a version the wall was about to kill — under the split, suppression stands down. Without the A/B（exp-tally at HEAD: 0 anomalies · with the wall: 4, no ballot ever）both would have shipped as「model chaos」. 5 pins; 7 legacy panel-arm smoke sections bracketed as pre-split-only | shipped |
| 31 | 08-01 · Ke-ish 卧底 | 「sometimes the tool doesn't surface at the right time」— deposit misfires, acts landing a beat late or not at all, right after something settled | the world cues rode ONLY the panel's channel（guest=""）— the prop master and the floor producer read EMPTY on every wake/settle turn, verdicted「the room is opening」mid-game, and the hands never moved on exactly the moments the world had just changed | the blind-coordinator fix: a world cue is the turn's ask, so it rides BOTH channels（text + guest）from the one doorway（_world_cue）— never recorded as a human line | shipped |
| 30 | 07-31 · lever | the panel answered EVERY turn — two humans mid-exchange got a host line between them, and the prompt-level「everyone silent」staging still ran (and paid for) the panel call, which could disobey | silence had no mechanism — only a staging suggestion the panel model was free to ignore | THE SILENCE DOOR: on the floor producer's [MODE] hold the panel call is SKIPPED — free, structural silence; the batch rides the next drain. Hard guards in code（≥2 humans · never over a PROP verdict · never on a dispatch）; a coordinator hold event books every decision. Live probe: hold with intent「let the humans finish their thread」, the direct ask answered. Dial silence_door, default ON | shipped |
| 29 | 07-31 · lever | after the deliberate setup speech the cards land silently — the room reads the rules, the deal appears, and nobody says whose move it is until a guest speaks first | the deliberate turn has two fires（speak · arm）but a real GM has three: explain → cards land → point at who starts | THE CODA: when phase 2 arms something that waits on players, one short beat hands the first move（「Amy 先来」）— skipped if anyone spoke meanwhile, its own act call pinned OFF. Live probe:「Cards are down… Amy, you go first.」Dial coda, default ON; the exam's _turn mirrors it | shipped |
| 28 | 07-31 · gauntlet re-measure | a deliberate act whose form compiled to nothing（a deal with NO deck）died in silence — n=0, no outcome booked, the host pantomimed a round over a bare table | the classic path books compile refusals when the next decode consumes self._act — but a deliberate act's self._act is OVERWRITTEN by the next turn's own assignment before anyone reads it: the channel is a graveyard on this path, and the docstring's promise（「the next turn's outcome channel carries whatever refused」）was dead code | deliberate_finish books act.refused directly（cap 3, the classic booking mirrored）+ a smoketest pin — the v555 law holds on both orders now | closed |
| 27 | 07-31 · gauntlet N=4 | 「快点，重新发牌」armed op=away on the standing deal and nothing else — the take-back half of a re-deal, no new deal behind it, then a speech claiming 「已经发好了」 over a bare table | the manual taught `op` including away, but never that a RE-DEAL is a single move — the replace rule lives in the applier and the model had no way to know laying the new deal collects the old one by itself | the counter-case in the op bullet: a re-deal IS a new deal, never op=away alone · re-measure: recovers 2/4 → 3/4, the away-alone shape gone; the one miss re-dealt ROLE LABELS（平民/卧底 as the deck）— the older, known family | closed |
| 26 | 07-31 · gauntlet N=4 | the deferred act call answered a SETUP with a clarifying question（missing=「这一局到底有没有卧底？」, n=0）— nothing armed, and the host pantomimed the round over a bare table | the speech declared the blind-round variant（「卧底可能有，也可能根本没有」）— a secret kept FROM THE PLAYERS — and the form-filler read a deliberately-open value as missing info; a deliberate turn has NOBODY to ask, so the question fell into the void | the spec law now says it: choosing the unnamed values IS the job, missing is not an answer on this turn — a thing kept secret from the players is not missing info · re-measure: the question-back shape gone; one run obeyed by OMITTING the deck instead（→ #28） | closed |
| 25 | 07-31 · self-play wolf3 | a mimed night phase（「狼人请睁眼…指给我看」in a text room）— the honesty line fires in ~half of runs | structural: the night needs PRIVATE persona→player messages the room does not have; a profile line against a structural gap is probabilistic by nature | open — the whisper channel is the real fix (T7 family); until then the honesty line + decline clause are the mitigation | open |
| 24 | 07-31 · self-play spy1/spy2/wolf3 | he dealt 谁是卧底 for ONE player — below his own declared 3-player floor — and laid a werewolf table under an open question | the deliberation note ORDERED a setup（「explain the game and the table」）and its last-slot position outranked the persona's own rules; the spec law then armed whatever followed | the DECLINE clause（saying no is a complete setup）+ kind=none on a declined or still-open table · re-run: spy1/spy2 REFUSED in character | closed |
| 23 | 07-31 · Who's spy, session 2 | 「大家都知道有一张牌叫西瓜了」 — the elimination reveal told the spy the civilian word | two causes in one turn: G7's hole — deal_reveal carried spec+deck unconditionally, so ONE hand opening published the whole sealed pile; and my own G9 text taught 「the voted-out card is turned face up」 — the wrong rule for 谁是卧底 (an eliminated word is never shown; the host announces 卧底/不是卧底 off the map) | the reveal withholds a sealed pile · the profile rule corrected（「亮词等于把答案发给卧底」）· pinned | closed |
| 22 | 07-31 · Who's spy, session 2 | 「你瞎说，你再仔细看看一共有几个三？」 — the host counted 2 threes over a table holding 4+, then re-asserted the wrong count twice | the 吹牛 reveal hands the model raw faces across three hands; counting X-of-a-face is prose arithmetic — the 20Q drift, one tool over | the settle cue now carries a SERVER-COMPUTED table-wide face tally（「3×4 · 1×2 …」, read-never-recount） | closed — a 吹牛 exam scenario still owed |
| 21 | 07-31 · Who's spy, session 2 | 「桌上没有骰子」·「所有人都要摇啊」 — four consecutive re-roll attempts, players seeing nothing | two silent doors: for="mary"（a display name）resolved to nobody and FELL THROUGH to the persona's-own-roll branch, so the GM got a die labelled「mary」and mary got no button; and the roll cap was 2 with overflow as a SLICE — the third player's dice vanished uncounted（v555 in its purest form） | an unresolvable for= refuses loudly（ids or all, never names）· cap 4 with the fifth booked · pinned ×3 | closed |
| 20 | 07-31 · Who's spy, session 2 | the per-player penalty round（5·5·4 dice）could not be expressed in one card | a roll card's spec is uniform — dice="5d6" for="all" has no per-hand counts, so a 吹牛 penalty round needs N separate cards（which then hit the cap） | tool gap, recorded: a per-hand spec map（the deal's each, for dice）— design owed | open |
| 19 | 07-31 · Who's spy, session 2 | deliberate-first fired on 换个游戏 — the explanation was right, and phase 2 armed cleanup + scoreboard but FORGOT THE DICE（「你骰子还没拿出来呢？」） | the deferred act spent its forms on aways + the board and omitted the roll the speech promised — one-turn recovery, but the spec law needs 「arm everything the speech promises FIRST, cleanup after」 | recorded; the spec prompt gains the priority line next pass — with the deliberate A/B to prove it | open — narrowed by recovery |
| 18 | 07-30 · the gauntlet, maiden run | four of eight new scenarios found something at N=2: a VOTE armed where a deal was asked (s43) · recovery 1/2 with a re-deal leak (s44) · the terse register halves the arm rate (s47) · a non-GM persona deals a playable deck and says the words aloud (s48) | measured, not yet fixed — the s44/s48 leaks share one root (the model chooses the words, so it holds them: ledger #11); s47 is register bias the whole battery shares | the gauntlet · then the deliberate-first turn shipped the same hour: s43 arm 1/2→4/4 · s44 recovers 3/4 with the leak gone · s47 4/4 clean. Two leak shapes remain（a 3/4-compliant setup note · mid-game GM speculation naming a deck word）— both point at #11 | narrowed — N=8 owed |
| 17 | 07-30 · Who's spy (:8011) | persona 「just can't set up the tools in the right way」 — 「收了。重新发——」 six turns, table never changed | the deal deadlock: arming over a live deal refused（「take that one away first」）while op="away" hit the closed-card refusal — a deal is born closed (⑥); away+deal in one beat impossible (acts apply last) | a new deal collects the standing one (⑨), conditional on its own arithmetic; addressed away = the take-back · 7c1a83d, 5 pins | closed |
| 16 | 07-30 · Who's spy | 「你告诉大家了，那还怎么玩？」 — the host read both game words aloud while dealing | the arm-turn leak: the act call CHOOSES the words in its own form, so the speech call holds them with no discipline note yet riding（notes arrive next turn） | a sealed-pile deal's claim note:「the words ARE the secret」· 7c1a83d · measured s42 no_leak 6/8 | narrowed — the remainder is #11 |
| 15 | 07-30 · Who's spy | 「上面只写了平民或者卧底。实际上应该是一个词语」 — cards carried role labels | the act call never reads the persona（G9's game knowledge is invisible to it）and nothing else taught the card-content convention | the deck schema teaches it: the card carries the WORD, one each, pile hidden · 7c1a83d | closed |
| 14 | 07-30 · Who's spy | 「牌已发出，每人两张」 over a visibly empty table | each=2 over a 3-card deck for 3 hands refused at the drain — a refusal the dry run did not predict, so the claim note said the card was going up | _would_refuse gains the deal's arithmetic · 7c1a83d, pinned | closed |
| 13 | 07-30 · Who's spy | the deal's own 「you have NOT seen the cards」 warning missing from every deal turn | the claim note keyed on the LEGACY kind spelling（「deck」）while the act call writes canon 「deal」 — the warning never fired once since the split shipped | canon kinds via instrument_concept (step 4's rule, one reader late) · 7c1a83d | closed |
| 12 | 07-30 · owner report (:8011) | 「he always give 斑马 when playing 20Q」 | the manual's ONLY worked example for the own-deposit was 斑马/zebra, six times — probed: 10/12 runs sealed the example word. His profile says nothing about zebras | the example is a quiz key（第5题答案：B — a shape no game answer can be）+ the hollow-note guard widened · 26790cd · top word 2/14 after | closed |
| 11 | 07-30 · recorded | an LLM asked for a random word has a mode no wording removes — and in 谁是卧底 the words chosen in the act form leak through speech | no server entropy: every secret is model-chosen, so it anchors AND the speech call holds it at arm time | the entropy feature: the server supplies the secret — the die's law extended to words. SHIPPED 07-31 as draw="words"（a deposit the house fills）and draw="pair" + a ?1/?1/?2 placeholder deck（the house draws the confusable pair at arm）; lib/wordpools.py holds the pools, the binding note and the dealer's map deliver the words, the tag and the history carry only the pool name. The act call reached for it UNPROMPTED in self-play（椰子 sealed for a full 20Q — the zebra rut dead）; measured on the three leak scenarios: hard leaks 8 → 1, and the non-GM control（Newton, #18）went from below floor to 4/4 clean — the mechanism protects personas that never trained the discipline | closed |
| 10 | 07-30 · the own-goal pair | s02 arm 7/8→3/8, hard leaks 0→3, from the G1+G6 first cut — caught only against a pre-change worktree | ① the new NONE bullet NAMED twenty questions against the PROP bullet that sets it up ② the deposit cell ended on the licence（the last clause carries） | shape-not-name + carve-out; licence first, line last · 6647ec9 · after: 8/8, leaks 1 | closed |
| 9 | 07-30 · 上海房价 (box) | 「the card deal ALWAYS disclose the full deck … doesn't work in 我是卧底」 | the deck's composition was hard-coded public — right for 狼人杀, fatal where the composition IS the secret | G7: deck_seen=all|dealer, sealed while live, published at the round's end · ce61dfd · leak plant + 12 pins | closed |
| 8 | 07-30 · 20Q (box) | counts wrong from turn 12 on;「the guess left is wrong in several turns」 | the running total was prose arithmetic — nothing in the room held the number（and the board's true row count was never offered） | G3 rows-as-fact + G8 counters on the board（server-projected, verb-owned direction）· 14c7f73+fe5e6f7 | closed — a counter exam scenario still owed |
| 7 | 07-30 · 20Q (box) | 「Ke Yu's answer is not the sealed word」 — reindeer over a 35-minute zebra | one prompt, two orders: THE TABLE forbade reasoning from an unrevealed deposit while THE BINDING said rule by it; and a mismatched <reveal> fell through to「the oldest」, destroying the one detectable signal | G1 scope-to-others + G2 refuse-the-mismatch · 14c7f73 · seal_traced gates s02, 8/8 | closed |
| 6 | 07-30 · 20Q (box) | a poll fired mid-game;「it fired a unwanted poll」 | the prop master had no rule for which SIDE of the table answers a question | G6's NONE bullet（the shape, not the game — see #10）· 14c7f73+6647ec9 | closed |
| 5 | 07-30 · 2T1F (box) | 「his content on the board is different from what he said」 | the act call transcribed a board from a 10×300 window; the source line sat 11 entries back at 439 chars — invented row 1, verbatim rows 2–3 | G4: 24×700 under a 12k budget, oldest-trimmed · 14c7f73 · replays the real turn | closed — split-only, never in a scored run |
| 4 | 07-30 · 2T1F (box) | 「he used notes to record contents」 and the board never changed | artifacts[] was a tag channel NO router scanned — the corrected <board> landed as a note titled with raw markup | G5 route + schema exclusion · 14c7f73 · 6 pins | closed |
| 3 | 07-30 · 2T1F (box) | 「fix the board」→ nothing;「Do it」→ nothing | the prop master read a write-to-a-live-card as NONE — its live-card clause named only lifecycle verbs | G6's PROP bullet: a write IS an act on the card · 14c7f73 | closed |
| 2 | 07-29 · two 20Q rooms (pre-deploy, shipped WITH v656) | 「收了。」 twice over a board that stayed up;「起了。第一问已记上」 over a board that never changed | the lifecycle-audit classes C1–C8: away unreachable for the three singletons; the same-turn note a prediction, not a record | the lifecycle audit's 11 fixes · docs/toolbox-lifecycle-audit.html · exam s36–s41 | closed — s36 idle, C8 counted not cured |
| 1 | 07-29 · exam headline (context row) | — | the turn split buys reach and spends restraint（23/31 vs 12/31 clean · controls 3/9 vs 7/9 bare）— the standing trade every row above lives inside; the prop master is the restraint half | docs/exam.html · the prop master + G6 | the trade, not a bug |
count_drift/card_fidelity are wired and read 「nothing to score」 on every run today.--quick is un-split on purpose).no_leak red in --quick — pre-existing, documented in the exam.